When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Remove the "tabindex" from some form buttons on the "diff box" / "issue view content" page, let the browser use the default tab order.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Step one for a GitHub like commit status check ui:
Step two:
The design now will list all commit status checks which takes too much
space.
This is a pre-improve for #26247
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Currently this feature is only available to admins, but there is no
clear reason why. If a user can actually merge pull requests, then this
seems fine as well.
This is useful in situations where direct pushes to the repository are
commonly done by developers.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Show checkout instructions also when there is no permission to push,
for anyone who wants to locally test the changes.
* First checkout the branch exactly as is, without immediately having to
solve merge conflicts. Leave this to the merge step, since it's often
convenient to test a change without worrying about this.
* Use `git fetch -u`, so an existing local branch is updated when
re-testing the same pull request. But not the more risky `git fetch -f`
in to handle force pushes, as we don't want to accidentally overwrite
important local changes.
* Show different merge command depending on the chosen merge style,
interactively updated.
TODOs:
- [x] write test for `GetIssueTotalTrackedTime`
- [x] frontport kitharas template changes and make them mobile-friendly
---
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
If you set a checkbox as required in a issue form at the moment, the
checkbox is checked and read only, what does not make much sense. With
this PR, the Checkbox actually needs to be checked. The label supports
now also Markdown. This matches GitHub's behaviour.
And yes, I know the CSS is a ugly workaround. It looks like the given
CSS code is part Fomantic and I don't know how to change that. The
Maintainers are free to change that.
The ui of list header in milestone page is not same as issue and pr list
page.
And they are using different template codes which can be merged into
one.
Before:
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: puni9869 <80308335+puni9869@users.noreply.github.com>
- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request
changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26820
## Archived labels UI for issue filter and issue filter actions for
issues/pull request pages.
Changed:
* Enhanced the Issue filter and Issue filter actions UI page to
seamlessly incorporate a list of archived labels.
* Pagination functionality is same as before. If archived label checkbox
is checked then we are adding a query string`archived=true` in the url
to save the state of page.
* Issue filter actions menu is separated into different template.
* Adding the archived flag in issue url labels.
* Pull Request page is also work the same.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
### Issue page
<img width="1360" alt="image"
src="d7efb2ef-5b2b-449d-83f0-d430a32ec432">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when not
checked --> No archived label is there in list
<img width="1249" alt="image"
src="ceea68ef-91f2-4693-910f-2e25e236bfc9">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when checked
--> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="710" alt="image"
src="2414d26b-2079-4c3c-bd9e-f2f5411bcabf">
### Issue page with label filter on issue action menu on archived label
checkbox when checked --> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="409" alt="image"
src="259cac87-3e21-4778-99a2-a6a0b8c81178">
### Applied the archived=true in Issue labels when archived checkbox is
checked.
<img width="984" alt="image"
src="657ce3db-c0ae-402e-b12d-3b580d3c2ed0">
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Signed-off-by: puni9869 <punitinani1@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
I think it's better if the primary actions have primary color instead of
green which fits better into the overall single-color UI design. This PR
currently replaces every green button with primary:
<img width="141" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 59"
src="843c1e50-4fb2-4ec6-84ba-0efb9472dcbe">
<img width="161" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 51"
src="9442195a-a3b2-4a42-b262-8377d6f5c0d1">
Modal actions now use uncolored/primary instead of previous green/red
colors. I also removed the box-shadow on all basic buttons:
<img width="259" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 16 39"
src="5beea529-127a-44b0-8d4c-afa7b034a490">
<img width="261" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 17 42"
src="4757f7b2-4d46-49bc-a797-38bb28437b88">
The change currently includes the "Merge PR" button, for which we might
want to make an exception to match the icon color there:
<img width="442" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 33 53"
src="993ac1a5-c94d-4895-b76c-0d872181a70b">
Close#27012
By the way, rename the single-word ID to a long ID.
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26478
## Archived labels UI
Changed:
* Enhanced the Filtered UI page to seamlessly incorporate a list of
archived labels.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fix#26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Removed CSS helper classes (some of them are not useful while some of
them are abused often)
* `gt-db`: in most cases it could be replaced by `gt-df` and the flex
layout should be encouraged. Other cases: either it does need the
`gt-df` (eg: by using `div` directly) or it is an abuse (eg: the warning
message in a form)
* `gt-di`: it doesn't seem useful, or it could be replaced by `gt-dib`
in most cases.
* `gt-dif`: not useful, it could be replaced by `flex-text-inline` or
`gt-df`
* `gt-js`: never used
* All `<i class="icon gt-df gt-ac gt-jc">` could be written as `<i
class="icon">`
## Some UI samples
### Admin Notice
### Admin Stacktrace
### Org Home
### Org Team Repo
### Release List
### User Setting Application Token Scope
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26567#issue-1855312074
> The terms `closest` and `furthest` don't describe the actual sorting
behavior as these two are semantically relative to the current date.
> Could we switch to `earliest` and `latest` instead?
close#26567
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR refactors a bunch of projects-related code, mostly the
templates.
The following things were done:
- rename boards to columns in frontend code
- use the new `ctx.Locale.Tr` method
- cleanup template, remove useless newlines, classes, comments
- merge org-/user and repo level project template together
- move "new column" button into project toolbar
- move issue card (shared by projects and pinned issues) to shared
template, remove useless duplicated styles
- add search function to projects (to make the layout more similar to
milestones list where it is inherited from 😆)
- maybe more changes I forgot I've done 😆Closes#24893
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
We are using `<a>` for commit status check icon with no link. So it is
clickable but this is no sense.
I think we can convert this to `div`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Closes#26263
We have to pass the date without the time.
# Before
# After
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
