- Remove `gitea.com/lunny/dingtalk_webhook` as dependency, we only use
two structs which are small enough to be recreated in Forgejo and don't
need to rely on the dependency.
- Existing tests (thanks @oliverpool) prove that this has no effect.
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
(cherry picked from commit 26653b196bd1d15c532af41f60351596dd4330bd)
Conflicts:
services/webhook/deliver_test.go
trivial context conflict
- Unset the http proxies environments for the `TestWebhookProxy`.
- Resolves#2132
(cherry picked from commit 244b9786fc)
(cherry picked from commit 8602dfa6a2)
(cherry picked from commit 8621449209)
(cherry picked from commit aefa77f917)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.
This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
When `webhook.PROXY_URL` has been set, the old code will check if the
proxy host is in `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` or reject requests through the
proxy. It requires users to add the proxy host to `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST`.
However, it actually allows all requests to any port on the host, when
the proxy host is probably an internal address.
But things may be even worse. `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` doesn't really work
when requests are sent to the allowed proxy, and the proxy could forward
them to any hosts.
This PR fixes it by:
- If the proxy has been set, always allow connectioins to the host and
port.
- Check `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` before forwarding.
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24368
## what my pull request does
Since the official documentation states that custom bots do not support
hyperlink functionality, simply adding it without making some formatting
changes would result in an unappealing output. Therefore, I have
modified the formatting of the output. Currently, it is only used for
Feishu.
---
[docs](https://open.feishu.cn/document/uAjLw4CM/ukTMukTMukTM/im-v1/message/create_json#%E8%B6%85%E9%93%BE%E6%8E%A5%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AF%B4%E6%98%8E)
<img width="641" alt="image"
src="360e1c81-ab64-4ef6-851e-aa450d6e85a4">
- Issue
<img width="423" alt="image"
src="519f6fae-81ab-4ec8-89b8-f6a73ff93783">
- Issue Comment
<img width="548" alt="image"
src="749c0d1c-3657-431e-b787-8bf4c23cce83">
- Assign
<img width="431" alt="image"
src="066f99e5-eabb-455d-91fb-a8359cc26dc7">
<img width="457" alt="image"
src="c6c10f99-db83-46ef-a775-4c91979fa68f">
- Merge
<img width="408" alt="image"
src="e627bf43-5954-45aa-acf6-261ee046802f">
- PullRequest
<img width="425" alt="image"
src="72cfa714-d3fa-4fb9-abdd-e8508d756056">
We now include the branch filler in the response.
- Closes#26591
# Before

# After

---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Add webhook events for pull request review requests
- Fixes#26371
- Added support for the "Pull request review requested" and "Pull
request review request removed" webhook events.
- Updated the `getPullRequestPayloadInfo` function in `general.go` to
handle these new webhook events.
# Before

# After

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Attemp fix: #25744
Fixing the log level when we delete any repo then we get error hook not
found by id. That should be warn level to reduce the noise in the logs.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
after #24481
To keep consistent, maybe pull_request_review_request is better.
## what my pull request does
Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest.
<img width="1087" alt="image"
src="2cf91f02-74f2-42fe-a998-0a039b821d8d">