- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request
changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26820
## Archived labels UI for issue filter and issue filter actions for
issues/pull request pages.
Changed:
* Enhanced the Issue filter and Issue filter actions UI page to
seamlessly incorporate a list of archived labels.
* Pagination functionality is same as before. If archived label checkbox
is checked then we are adding a query string`archived=true` in the url
to save the state of page.
* Issue filter actions menu is separated into different template.
* Adding the archived flag in issue url labels.
* Pull Request page is also work the same.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
### Issue page
<img width="1360" alt="image"
src="d7efb2ef-5b2b-449d-83f0-d430a32ec432">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when not
checked --> No archived label is there in list
<img width="1249" alt="image"
src="ceea68ef-91f2-4693-910f-2e25e236bfc9">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when checked
--> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="710" alt="image"
src="2414d26b-2079-4c3c-bd9e-f2f5411bcabf">
### Issue page with label filter on issue action menu on archived label
checkbox when checked --> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="409" alt="image"
src="259cac87-3e21-4778-99a2-a6a0b8c81178">
### Applied the archived=true in Issue labels when archived checkbox is
checked.
<img width="984" alt="image"
src="657ce3db-c0ae-402e-b12d-3b580d3c2ed0">
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Signed-off-by: puni9869 <punitinani1@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
I think it's better if the primary actions have primary color instead of
green which fits better into the overall single-color UI design. This PR
currently replaces every green button with primary:
<img width="141" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 59"
src="843c1e50-4fb2-4ec6-84ba-0efb9472dcbe">
<img width="161" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 51"
src="9442195a-a3b2-4a42-b262-8377d6f5c0d1">
Modal actions now use uncolored/primary instead of previous green/red
colors. I also removed the box-shadow on all basic buttons:
<img width="259" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 16 39"
src="5beea529-127a-44b0-8d4c-afa7b034a490">
<img width="261" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 17 42"
src="4757f7b2-4d46-49bc-a797-38bb28437b88">
The change currently includes the "Merge PR" button, for which we might
want to make an exception to match the icon color there:
<img width="442" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 33 53"
src="993ac1a5-c94d-4895-b76c-0d872181a70b">
Close#27012
By the way, rename the single-word ID to a long ID.
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26478
## Archived labels UI
Changed:
* Enhanced the Filtered UI page to seamlessly incorporate a list of
archived labels.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fix#26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Removed CSS helper classes (some of them are not useful while some of
them are abused often)
* `gt-db`: in most cases it could be replaced by `gt-df` and the flex
layout should be encouraged. Other cases: either it does need the
`gt-df` (eg: by using `div` directly) or it is an abuse (eg: the warning
message in a form)
* `gt-di`: it doesn't seem useful, or it could be replaced by `gt-dib`
in most cases.
* `gt-dif`: not useful, it could be replaced by `flex-text-inline` or
`gt-df`
* `gt-js`: never used
* All `<i class="icon gt-df gt-ac gt-jc">` could be written as `<i
class="icon">`
## Some UI samples
### Admin Notice
### Admin Stacktrace
### Org Home
### Org Team Repo
### Release List
### User Setting Application Token Scope
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26567#issue-1855312074
> The terms `closest` and `furthest` don't describe the actual sorting
behavior as these two are semantically relative to the current date.
> Could we switch to `earliest` and `latest` instead?
close#26567
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR refactors a bunch of projects-related code, mostly the
templates.
The following things were done:
- rename boards to columns in frontend code
- use the new `ctx.Locale.Tr` method
- cleanup template, remove useless newlines, classes, comments
- merge org-/user and repo level project template together
- move "new column" button into project toolbar
- move issue card (shared by projects and pinned issues) to shared
template, remove useless duplicated styles
- add search function to projects (to make the layout more similar to
milestones list where it is inherited from 😆)
- maybe more changes I forgot I've done 😆Closes#24893
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
We are using `<a>` for commit status check icon with no link. So it is
clickable but this is no sense.
I think we can convert this to `div`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Closes#26263
We have to pass the date without the time.
# Before
# After
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
I find the colored buttons in the issue sidebar distracting, given that
they are not primary actions, I think we can de-colorize them.
Before:
<img width="285" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 42 22"
src="7e784805-4e01-4199-94bb-0538a0130264">
<img width="288" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 43 06"
src="3a89c661-e24a-4ebf-a585-d404d0a6a78a">
<img width="285" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 44 36"
src="c1aa8c13-6f41-4763-8149-d1c07cb4be5c">:
After:
<img width="286" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 42 04"
src="74d640c2-e0ab-4fef-87aa-9e788e9010e2">
<img width="285" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 42 51"
src="3b69976a-9aa4-4e1c-8df3-4168f4a9fcf9">
<img width="286" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-26 at 19 45 15"
src="897222fd-4df2-4d99-98eb-e5f8fb77c4d6">
This problem occurs because in #25839, the warning status has been
removed, but there is something in the tmpl that hasn't been changed.
related #25839close#26118
Issue filters are being used on repo list page and on milestone issues
page, and the code is mostly duplicated.
This PR does the following changes:
- move issue filters into a shared template
- allow filtering milestone issues by project, so no need to hide this
filter on milestone issues page
- remove some dead code (e. g. issue actions in milestone issues
template)
- fix label filter dropdown width
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Archive text title center align
<details>
<summary>Screen shots</summary>
Before
After
BTW On github
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Should look exactly like before for normal dividers. "Horizontal" ones
look better because they no longer use image backgrounds.
<img width="917" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 19 07 56"
src="d97d8dec-6859-44a8-85ba-e4549b4dd9df">
<img width="914" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 19 05 58"
src="8bf98544-2d82-4ebf-ac68-d6dc237bd6b2">
<img width="1246" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 19 00 42"
src="36a6bb21-6029-4f53-8bee-535f55c66fed">
<img width="344" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 18 58 15"
src="a9e70aee-8e6b-4ea1-9e93-19c9f96aec6e">
<img width="823" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 18 56 22"
src="e7a497cd-f262-4683-8872-23c3c8cce32f">
<img width="330" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 19 21 11"
src="42f24149-a655-4c7e-bd26-8ab52db6446b">
Before:
<img width="364" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-20 at 11 59 11"
src="ad284b7e-8d21-43be-b178-bbcfd37cb5bd">
Might trigger many posts when keep clicking the buttons above.
<img width="448" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-20 at 11 52 28"
src="a60aa6ac-af74-45e4-b13a-512b436b81b0">
<img width="678" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-20 at 11 52 37"
src="d6662700-3643-4cc7-a2ec-64e1c0f5fbdb">
After (PR sidebar, Same for issue):
9df3ad1f-e29c-439b-8bde-e6b917d63cc6
For delete, it is using `base/modal_actions_confirm` subtemplate, and we
might need another general solution for this (maybe add another
attribute to the subtemplate or something)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
