1
0
Fork 0
forked from forgejo/forgejo
This commit is contained in:
techknowlogick 2021-02-28 18:08:33 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 030646eea4
commit 47f6a4ec3f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
947 changed files with 26119 additions and 7062 deletions

26
vendor/github.com/miekg/dns/doc.go generated vendored
View file

@ -194,6 +194,30 @@ request an AXFR for miek.nl. with TSIG key named "axfr." and secret
You can now read the records from the transfer as they come in. Each envelope
is checked with TSIG. If something is not correct an error is returned.
A custom TSIG implementation can be used. This requires additional code to
perform any session establishment and signature generation/verification. The
client must be configured with an implementation of the TsigProvider interface:
type Provider struct{}
func (*Provider) Generate(msg []byte, tsig *dns.TSIG) ([]byte, error) {
// Use tsig.Hdr.Name and tsig.Algorithm in your code to
// generate the MAC using msg as the payload.
}
func (*Provider) Verify(msg []byte, tsig *dns.TSIG) error {
// Use tsig.Hdr.Name and tsig.Algorithm in your code to verify
// that msg matches the value in tsig.MAC.
}
c := new(dns.Client)
c.TsigProvider = new(Provider)
m := new(dns.Msg)
m.SetQuestion("miek.nl.", dns.TypeMX)
m.SetTsig(keyname, dns.HmacSHA1, 300, time.Now().Unix())
...
// TSIG RR is calculated by calling your Generate method
Basic use pattern validating and replying to a message that has TSIG set.
server := &dns.Server{Addr: ":53", Net: "udp"}
@ -260,7 +284,7 @@ From RFC 2931:
on requests and responses, and protection of the overall integrity of a response.
It works like TSIG, except that SIG(0) uses public key cryptography, instead of
the shared secret approach in TSIG. Supported algorithms: DSA, ECDSAP256SHA256,
the shared secret approach in TSIG. Supported algorithms: ECDSAP256SHA256,
ECDSAP384SHA384, RSASHA1, RSASHA256 and RSASHA512.
Signing subsequent messages in multi-message sessions is not implemented.